Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 396 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $106.47 vs $624.95
- Up to 83% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.99 vs $5.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 5 2500X - 109 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 32 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
108
99.08256880733946%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32821 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.73/FPS
17.277486910994764%
Price, $
$624.95
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $624.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
94.1929974380871%
Multi-Core
3801
50.41782729805014%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |