Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 808 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 278 vs 268 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $120.0 vs $135.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 5 2400G - $0.43 vs $0.5 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1022 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
278
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1020 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |