Buy on Amazon
$120
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 953 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $120.0 vs $429.95
- Up to 72% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-5820K - $0.71 vs $2.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 1600 - 170 vs 168 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 65W AM4 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler (YD1600BBAFBOX)
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Intel CM8064801548435 CORE I7-5820K Processor (15M Cache, UP to 3.60 GHZ)
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Haswell E |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Ryzen 5 1600 or Core i7-5820K
No Man's Sky, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
47 FPS
$18.08/FPS
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Ryzen 5 1600
8 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$849.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
