Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is 2533 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Performs up to 87% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-6300 - 43 vs 23 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - $58.04 vs $150.99
- Up to 28% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - $2.52 vs $3.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
FPS
43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.51/FPS
71.7948717948718%
Price, $
$150.99
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41081 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
23
53.48837209302325%
Value, $/FPS
$2.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $58.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |