Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - $98.04 vs $190.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 5 3600X - $0.16 vs $0.26 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 21% better in Minecraft than FX-6300 - 728 vs 600 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $98.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6462 minutes ago
Buy for $190 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6468 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |