Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1697 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-6700T - 179 vs 173 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $99.9 vs $150.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.58 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12724 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
173
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12725 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |