Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 258 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 23% better in Rust than Ryzen 3 3250U - 204 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |