Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 733 days older than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 15 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 8% better in Minecraft than Ryzen 3 3200U - 690 vs 636 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
690
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $42.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |