Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1881 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Celeron 3205U - 277 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
277
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Celeron 3205U |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 15.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |