Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2300X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2300X is 1463 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
- Performs up to 10% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 168 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen 3 2300X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 135 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
