Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 1218 days older than Ryzen 3 2200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 15 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Ryzen 3 2200U - 174 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200U - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |