Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1616 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 154 vs 147 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |