Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2156 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $130.0 vs $209.99
- Up to 5% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-14400F - $0.69 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 52% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 288 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
189
65%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2304 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
94%
Price, $
$209.99
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2303 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |