Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1750 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4350 - 198 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74710 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |