Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1999 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 43% better in Starfield than FX-4350 - 63 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |