Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1738 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 30% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8320 - 306 vs 236 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $74.82 vs $369.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 8 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $369 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75745 minutes ago
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75743 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |