Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $64.3 vs $366.55
- Up to 63% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-14700F - $0.43 vs $1.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 114% better in F1 23 than FX-8320 - 317 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 28 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $64.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
317
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
37%
Price, $
$366.55
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $366.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |