Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 4737 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom X4 9650 - 145 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |