Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 5396 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $19.95 vs $295.51
- Up to 93% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-13700F - $0.12 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Phenom X4 9650 - 184 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 24 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
160
86.95652173913044%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
7.453416149068322%
Price, $
$295.51
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $295.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
8.944006012777152%
Multi-Core
765
4.94345718901454%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |