Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 2605 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-5675C - $39.99 vs $90.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-5675C - $0.31 vs $0.42 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 65% better in F1 23 than Phenom X4 9650 - 215 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
130
60.46511627906976%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3671 minutes ago
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
73.80952380952381%
Price, $
$90
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
17.761194029850746%
Multi-Core
765
18.754596714881096%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |