Buy on Amazon
$153
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 1671 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 2% better in DOOM Eternal than Phenom X4 9650 - 450 vs 442 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 8 vs 4 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
450
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$153
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FD8320FRHKBOX FX-8320 FX-Series 8-Core Black Edition Processor
Buy for $153 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | FX |
| Agena | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
