Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 4044 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $189.95 vs $279.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-9700F - $1.84 vs $2.13 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 27% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9550 - 131 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
103
78%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |