Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 5682 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - $189.95 vs $375.73
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-14700KF - $1.17 vs $1.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 36% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Phenom X4 9550 - 222 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 28 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
163
73%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
69%
Price, $
$375.73
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $375.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |