Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 3431 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 95 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Fortnite than Phenom II X4 925 - 224 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 48 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
224
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$725
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $725 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2390 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
25.910931174089068%
Multi-Core
930
12.555690562980965%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Deneb | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 250 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |