Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 3265 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Phenom II X4 925 - 175 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 12 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
27.77777777777778%
Multi-Core
930
19.210906837430283%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Deneb | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |