Key Differences
In short — FX-6100 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 884 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Phenom II X4 925 - 156 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 6 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
83.98950131233596%
Multi-Core
930
75.98039215686273%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | FX |
Deneb | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |