Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 4166 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 21% better in Valorant than Phenom II X4 810 - 813 vs 671 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 24 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
813
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Deneb | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |