Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3420 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3420 is 313 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 23 than FX-8300 - 158 vs 147 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than FX-8300 - $21.1 vs $112.02
- Up to 83% better value when playing F1 23 than FX-8300 - $0.13 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12196 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$21.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $21.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Pentium G3420 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |