Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - $100.0 vs $170.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-7600K - $0.6 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8300 - 176 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 91 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Buy for $170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |