Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 2315 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $78.02 vs $135.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 5 2400G - $0.33 vs $0.53 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than FX-8120 - 255 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4144 minutes ago
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |