Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 1020 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Warcraft than Pentium G6950 - 155 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 61% cheaper than FX-6300 - $37.93 vs $98.04
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $98.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Buy for $37.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
324
69.97840172786177%
Multi-Core
517
35.58155540261528%
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |