Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1043 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 39% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - $58.04 vs $95.31
- Up to 37% better value when playing Lost Ark than Pentium G4400 - $0.26 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 4% better in Lost Ark than FX-6300 - 231 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
223
96.53679653679653%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $58.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3988 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
63.41463414634146%
Price, $
$95.31
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $95.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3990 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |