Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1938 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $58.02 vs $135.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than FX-6300 - 117 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74853 minutes ago
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74855 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |