Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4388 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $29.65 vs $389.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Core i9-14900KF - $0.35 vs $2.17 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 111% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-6100 - 179 vs 85 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
85
47.486033519553075%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.17/FPS
16.129032258064516%
Price, $
$389
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |