Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 2633 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 88% better in FIFA 23 than FX-4350 - 179 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 64 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1525
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,525 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38089 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |