Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1275 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-4350 - 128 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 44 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76883 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 22 |
4 | Threads | 44 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 145 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |