Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1982 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 125 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 9% better in No Man's Sky than FX-4350 - 171 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 48 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$725
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $725 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 250 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |