Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i9-9900KF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 211 days newer than Core i9-9900KF.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Warcraft than Core i9-9900KF - 198 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 95 vs 225 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
192
96%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 8 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |