Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 587 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900K - 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than EPYC 7742 - 199 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 125 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$265
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 8 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |