Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms EPYC 75F3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 234 days newer than EPYC 75F3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 75F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than EPYC 75F3 - 162 vs 135 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 75F3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$283.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $283.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 75F3 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |