Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms EPYC 75F3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 561 days newer than EPYC 75F3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 75F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Escape From Tarkov than EPYC 75F3 - 236 vs 216 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 170 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 75F3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
236
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$516.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $516.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 75F3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 170 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |