Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1074 days newer than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G3250 - 122 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
EPYC | Collection | Pentium |
Naples | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |