Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 292 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 155 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than EPYC 7302P - 195 vs 183 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$587.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |