Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 292 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 155 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900X - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than EPYC 7302P - 130 vs 122 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$629.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $629.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |