Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 587 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11500 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 2042 than EPYC 7282 - 173 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$184
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $184 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11713 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |