Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 31 days older than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than EPYC 7282 - 153 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 95 vs 120 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rome | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |