Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2634 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3240T - 198 vs 190 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 74% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $25.7 vs $98.79
- Up to 72% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Athlon 3000G - $0.14 vs $0.5 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
28.000000000000004%
Price, $
$98.79
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
190
95.95959595959596%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
46.70846394984326%
Multi-Core
971
49.164556962025316%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |