Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2584 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than FX-6300 - 173 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74822 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |