Key Differences
In short — NOX AlpineSpeed outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of NOX Gaming AlpineSpeed Gaming PC
- Performs up to 117% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than MXZ - 558 vs 257 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming PC
- Up to 74% cheaper than NOX AlpineSpeed - $749.0 vs $2899.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than NOX AlpineSpeed - $2.91 vs $5.2 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
558
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.2/FPS
55.96153846153846%
Price, $
$2899.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4150 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
257
46.0573476702509%
Value, $/FPS
$2.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$749
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 2060
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
80.64 GPixel/s
50.90909090909091%
Texel Fillrate
201.6 GTexel/s
44.26877470355731%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
null-core
Single-Core
1871
64.80775891929338%
Multi-Core
7692
43.68965125525389%
NOX Gaming AlpineSpeed Gaming PC | vs | MXZ Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-13700KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 500 GB SSD |