Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MXZ Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 82% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $899.0 vs $5049.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing Battlefield V than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $6.07 vs $16.83 per FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 103% better in Battlefield V than MXZ - 300 vs 148 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
FPS
300
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.83/FPS
36%
Price, $
$5049.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,049.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
MXZ Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i3-13100 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 500 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
![[Geforce RTX 3060] 2022 HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B09THKWSLK.jpg)
